Search for: "O'Connor v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
As the Fifth Circuit has noted, "Some circuits follow Justice O';Connor's analysis while other circuits follow Justice Brennan's analysis. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
Link: Read The Decision Along in the majority with Kennedy were Justices John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day OConnor, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:18 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Supreme Court decision, Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:57 am by Eric
Shades of O';Connor's concurrence/dissent in Reno v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:29 am
This post comes from the Cozen O'Connor side of the blog.To those of us who were unable to find a slide in anything that Chase Utley did Saturday night, it made a whole lot of sense to suspend him for two games. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:40 am
Merritt, The Future of Religious Pluralism: Justice O'Connor and the Establishment Clause, 39 Arizona State Law Journal 895-948 (2007). [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 6:38 am
If so, the smart money is on Justice Anthony Kennedy, typically the swing vote since Justice O'Connor retired, to tip toe between these competing interpretations leading the Court to fashion a compromise. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:28 am by azatty
” Sandra Day O'Connor makes a point at the roundtable discussion. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:20 pm by Josh Blackman
So were Bryon White, William Rehnquist, and Sandra Day O'Connor, none of whom was a special champion of Indian rights. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:56 pm by Orin S. Kerr
"), citing United States v Karo, 468 US 705, 725-727; 104 S Ct 3296; 82 L Ed 2d 530 (1984) (O'Connor, J., concurring). [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:02 am
O'Connor: Supreme Court Rulings Shouldn't Differ Based on Who Sits on Court The Associated Press Retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor says the Supreme Court should generally follow its prior rulings so the public has confidence that laws do not change just because justices come and go. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From Justice O'Connor, concurring in 471 US 84:The Government has not disputed that appellees sought in good faith to comply with the statutory deadline. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am by Marty Lederman
United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992). [read post]