Search for: "P. v. Bell" Results 301 - 320 of 757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
 Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
  However, in Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers([2001] EWHC 32 (QB)) Butler-Sloss P held that such an injunction could be granted in support of an action for breach of confidence. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
P. 3.851 was affirmed because the inmate was unable to establish that trial counsel’s performance was deficient. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am by RobKornfeld
After observing and hearing argument, I believe that the Court should reverse the Court of Appeals and trial judge because the admission of this evidence at trial is so prejudicial that once the “bell was rung” there was no unringing  the bell with a curative or limiting instruction. [read post]