Search for: "PIERCE v PIERCE"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2021, 8:11 am
Steinberg v Schnapp, 73 AD3d 171, 176 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:03 am
The statute here can draw on analogous inquiries that courts conduct when they pierce the veil of corporate structures, analyze who the "real party in interest" is in a federal case, or scrutinize whether a legal party is merely an agent for someone else. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Buarotti v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
Mims v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Table 1: Selected County and Municipal Rental Car Excise Taxes State Locality Car Rental Excise Tax Funding Purpose Alaska Anchorage 8% City general fund Arizona Maricopa County (Phoenix) The greater of 3.25% or $2.50 per rental Glendale Stadium; youth & amateur sports Arizona Pima County (Tucson) $3.50 Kino Sports Complex Colorado Denver 7.25% Colorado Convention Center Georgia Atlanta 10% State Farm Arena Illinois Chicago 6% and 9% transaction tax (a) City general fund Indiana Marion… [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 7:40 am
Pierce, 506 S.W.3d 153, 165 (Tex. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:35 am
” In Triyar Hospitality Management, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
3/16/25: Pierce v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 7:02 am
” Judge Brann found that veil-piercing was appropriate in light of undisputed evidence of: (i) Snider’s domination of the corporate entities; (ii) the closely held nature of corporate entities; (iii) the absence of any corporate formalities; (iv) Snider’s commingling of corporate and personal funds; and (v) Snider’s “careful effort” to liquidate the entities’ assets and render them judgment-proof after Fresh Direct severed ties with… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am
Long before enactment of the BCL, New York’s highest court held in Darcy v Brooklyn & N.Y. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
This column will develop these two perspectives.Easier to DefendSince the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in Fordyce v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Translational similarity may be a special case where consumers react differently [v. my example of the UNC and University of Wisconsin cases in the US where the PTO said that consumers had stubbornly continued to perceive the marks as indicating a single source despite over 100 years, in the former case, of uncontrolled use]. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 8:14 am
” “The leading case in that area remains Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG,(4) which concerned accountants providing litigation support services. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:55 am
Such a discharge violates a clear mandate of public policy and therefore is unlawful Pierce v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Atari v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
Fund v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm
Case Example Where the Government Sought to Pierce the Corporate Veil of a Home Health Agency: In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
At twenty-one years old, Aaron Westrick shook hands with death. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 8:31 pm
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 at 881, citing Pierce v. [read post]
