Search for: "Parker v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 am
Parker v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:11 am
United States (2015) said "the critical question is not whether the unrelated investigation occurs before or after the officer issues a ticket, but whether conducting the unrelated investigation prolongs -- i.e. adds time to -- the stop. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
V. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 4:01 am
The question in Rock River Minerals, LP and Carr v. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:47 pm
Cir. 2002); see also Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
Texas Office of the Attorney General, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU): The MFCU is a specialized unit within the Texas Office of the Attorney General. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
(B) The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:04 am
Parker, LLC at 330-725-4114 to find out how our firm can help. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
The Newman and Chiasson Case In United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Because Parker has shown that the state courts unreasonably applied Jackson v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:00 am
This was an issue in Parker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
The history of Indian Territory, Oklahoma statehood, and the Creek and other Native nations is, like much Native history in the United States, tangled; if you are interested, you can find an amicus brief that I joined that delves into that complexity here. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:24 am
United States and Grupo Dataflux v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:33 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit issued an opinion in a case in 1994, that says the insurance company did not have to defend a case where the insured was sued for "emotional distress. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:58 am
United States, 503 U.S. 540 (1992), the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 pm
Timberlake is nonetheless entitled to the protections of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
