Search for: "People v. Michael"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The draft Public Order Act 1986 (Serious Disruption to Life in the Community Regulations 2023, if they come into effect, will allow police in England and Wales to impose restrictions on protests and processions that cause “more than minor” hindrance to day-to-day activities for other people. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm
People v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am
In Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 am
More on that in Part V tomorrow, plus some big picture thoughts. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am
Sadly, data privacy often is a luxury that lower-income people cannot afford. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:12 am
From Monday's decision in People v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am
by Michael C. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
An example is Ciraolo v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
The cases include those brought by the Duke of Sussex, Nikki Sanderson, Fiona Wightman and Michael Turner. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:30 pm
(OI, v.1, 331). [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 4:00 am
See Deshotel v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:06 pm
As our brief explains, the Fifth Circuit’s decision denies crucial First Amendment protections that the Supreme Court sought to preserve in the 2019 case Nieves v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 2:50 pm
The CFO denied through his legal counsel doing anything illegal (See proceedings from Oakland County, People of the State of Michigan v Brian Michael White CR #2021-276874-FH). [read post]
