Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 301 - 320
of 25,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2017, 12:55 pm
There are undoubtedly people who are far more familiar with rap lyrics than I am. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
I don't imagine that the Court of Appeal made up that part on its own, so imagine it originated in the briefs somehow.Still. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 2:13 am
Part 2 now focuses on weak marks. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:27 am
DOR, Appeal No. 2015AP2019, DWD v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:41 am
A group of all star lawyers and judges will re-enact People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm
See Crowell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
In Gibson v Lord Advocate 1975 SC 136, 144 Lord Keith said: “The making of decisions upon what must essentially be a political matter is no part of the function of the Court, and it is highly undesirable that it should be. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:27 pm
So we continue with the second part of our view on this subject. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:48 am
Today’s Supreme Court decision on affirmative action is part of the backlash. [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:38 am
R v Bassett; [2008] WLR (D) 157 “For an offence of voyeurism to be committed, within the definition in s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there had to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1). [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
In the words of Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:08 pm
You can't "mix and match" and apply one rule to one part of the sentence and another to the rest.Hmmm. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:48 pm
I will express no opinion about the merits of Justice Nicholson's concurrence in this case, in which he argues that the vast majority of the Court of Appeal's opinion is unnecessary and unhelpful.He's surely right, however, that the most important part of this opinion -- to the litigants, anyway -- is its core finding that a guy convicted of having wire cutters while shoplifting from a store isn't carrying a "deadly weapon" such that he's categorically… [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 pm
But as the Court of Appeal notes in a footnote: "This was not correct: Sturm College of Law is a part of the University of Denver, not the University of Colorado. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:04 pm
Tough to keep out.But until today, I had no idea that mental health institutions that serve Sexually Violent Predators apparently have a similarly widespread problem with the internal distribution of . . . child pornography.Wow.Here's a part of what today's published opinion says about the subject:"CSH is a maximum-security psychiatric hospital with a patient population of 1,100, between 80 to 85 percent of whom are sexually violent predators. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:02 am
She's been committed to California Psychiatric Transition for the past five years, and seems to continue to have schizophrenia.But isn't it interesting how one tends to interpret behavior depending upon what one expects.For example, as part of establishing how Rosalinda is still mentally disabled, the Court of Appeal notes that "Rosalinda had recently begun to exhibit other symptoms indicating poor impulse control, such as urinating on herself on purpose in order to achieve other… [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:11 am
(Arguing, in a concurring opinion to an en banc opinion, in relevant part that wife-beaters, "though they might use a golf club or meat cleaver to threaten their mates, aren't likely to be packing such implements up their wazoos. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
In October or November of 2014, Nestdrop’s developers expanded the app to allow deliveries of medical marijuana in parts of the City. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:37 pm
To foreshadow: He's a prior felon, and part of his sentence for this whole affair includes a conviction for attempted arson. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 1:30 pm
I understand the whole part of this opinion about not necessarily being able to strike minority jurors due to their "attitude". [read post]
