Search for: "People v. Richardson" Results 301 - 320 of 430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm by Colin Murray
Last year’s Court of Human Rights judgment in Ponomaryov v Bulgaria did affirm (at [56]) that the right did not necessarily have the same effect at all levels of education and that, “at the University level, which so far remains optional for many people, higher fees for aliens – and indeed fees in general – seem to be commonplace and can, in the present circumstances, be considered fully justified. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here),  following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm by Bradley Joondeph
This broader scope of immunity had been embraced by Justice Scalia in his dissent in Richardson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:39 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case is a victory for people needing to sue an insurance company and its adjusters. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
”[ii] Judges, like most people, glibly assumed that what people normally or customarily do is reasonable. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm by Bexis
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 727 F.2d 608 (6th Cir. 1984) (DES – back to UK); Lin v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:19 pm by Sarah Riley Howard
The so-called castle doctrine was the subject of the Michigan Supreme Court’s July 29 opinion affirming the conviction in People v Richardson, No. 141752. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The case is People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:06 am by stu@crimapp.com
The Michigan Supreme Court in People v Richardson held that giving a duty to retreat instruction in a self-defense case where the Defendant did not have a duty to retreat wasn’t error. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Here is one for people in Grand Prairie, Arlington, Irving, Mansfield, Fort Worth, Dallas, Mesquite, Garland, Richardson, Farmers Branch, and other places in Texas to think about. [read post]