Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 49,875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
These guidelines largely follow the Federal Circuit’s holding in Thaler v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
Patty Gerstenblith, Distinguished Research Professor of Law at DePaul University, stated during her keynote address at the Kernochan Center’s symposium on Protecting Cultural Property, the significance of the destruction of cultural heritage sites “lies in the people. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Nicholas Noe
In 1977, it tried to prevent the government from abusing its authority to, in Congress’s words, “isolate the people of the United States from the people of any other country. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Many people in Canada declined to become vaccinated for COVID-19, some of them for religious reasons, which resulted in job losses, an issue that was raised in the case of Ontario Nurses’ Association v North East Home and Community Care Support Services. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Many people in Canada declined to become vaccinated for COVID-19, some of them for religious reasons, which resulted in job losses, an issue that was raised in the case of Ontario Nurses’ Association v North East Home and Community Care Support Services. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In last year's landmark affirmative action case, SFFA v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]