Search for: "Piper v. Piper"
Results 301 - 320
of 490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2020, 4:13 pm
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a piece. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:35 pm
"COMMENT: If not for Bloomberg's top-notch investigative journalism, ACT still wouldn't have been transparent about the one who pays the piper and picks the tune. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
In the case of Hategan v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm
Cuomo (2020) and Tandon v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:29 am
Savitt v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
The DLA Piper “Privacy Matters” blog has a post entitled “The Netherlands – DPA imposes €830,000 fine for access requests fees”. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:15 am
District Court for the Central District of California to step in and prevent their applications from moving forward (Planet.Eco LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
The Court took particular care to avoid ruling on a preemption issue raised by Morgan where Morgan argued that a New Jersey State case, Lefever v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
Republished by Blog Post Promoter Image of Andrea Goldman For this week’s Guest Post Friday, Musings welcomes a good friend, Andrea Goldman of the Home Contractor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:47 am
” “‘It is not unusual for DOJ to notify a party of a possible need to register when the department becomes aware of potentially-covered activity,’ said William Minor, who leads DLA Piper’s political law practice. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:25 am
In 1997, when commenting on Geer v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 12:06 am
The Court's unanimous decision in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
IA-6368 (Aug. 23, 2023) (the Adopting Release) available at https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2023/ia-6383.pdf.[2] National Association of Private Fund Managers v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 3:16 pm
That theory will run smack into the Rule 23 barriers created by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2025, 12:45 am
DLA Piper, Lexology: A clash of beliefs: The Higgs v Farmor’s School case: a helpful note on the case, with comment. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:21 pm
ISCC was represented before the UK High Court and CJEU by Piers Acland, QC on instructions from DLA Piper LLP [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
- Best Lock (C Chandler 2001): [T]he plaintiffs contend that the Information Statement contains misrepresentations about the financial data supplied to Piper by the management of the Best Companies and also fails to disclose that data. . . . [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Tatjana V. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:34 am
Harper, who represented the plaintiffs in the American Indian trust funds lawsuit, Cobell v. [read post]
