Search for: "Polk v. Polk" Results 301 - 320 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2014, 6:16 am
In a February 21, 2014 ruling, Judge Katherine Polk Failla denied in part and granted in part the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am by Dan Bressler
” After various facts played out and an unhappy client sued, said the Court: “‘An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:10 am by Broc Romanek
" The program was newsworthy, borne out by this Davis Polk blog regarding "Whistleblowers and Internal Certifications. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:31 pm
  In 2001, the Supreme Court overturned the death sentence of a second penalty phase trial (Penry v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Shearman note flags the SDNY’s recent decision in Xiang v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:29 am
[as noted on IPBiz.]Of the "get the drugs out there" part, one notes the current legal debate over reverse payments in the Schering-Plough case and in the Joblove case.One has text in an article by Legal Times about Joblove v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434). [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In light of the discretion imparted by the consent form, “the plaintiff[s’] contention that the alleged malpractice resulted in legally cognizable damages is conclusory and speculative inasmuch as it is premised on decisions that were within the sole discretion of the [hospital]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 436; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d at… [read post]