Search for: "Q. T. N."
Results 301 - 320
of 795
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm
And it seems you do lose thrust as you go faster: Q. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 7:27 pm
Q: Based on what? [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 2:10 pm
Q: Does this plan give back the more than $800 billion that Obamacare raided from Medicare? [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
Gangi, William T. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 3:14 pm
” Id. at *10 & n. 3 (Tashima, J., dissenting). [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:41 am
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Discrimination Why black workers who do everything right still get left behind — via Wonkblog Will The N-Word And Nooses Ever Stop? [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:09 pm
§ 78m(a), including Forms 10-Q and 10-K, the CEO and CFO of the issuer sign a certification as to the accuracy of the financial statements within the report. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Merges & Nelson on patent scope, Burk & Lemley on policy levers—if you read these side by side, you see M&N say patents are unsuited to software b/c corporate capital isn’t involved and it’s individual; B&L 20 years later say that patents are perfectly suited—b/c institutions have changed, everything else has changed in terms of economic analysis, policy analysis. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Stanley N. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
§ II(Q). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
Q: overlap in rights? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Doesn’t work at n=1, maybe not w/physical resources; sidelines normative debate and values; takes a long time and needs dedicated research community. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
A Well, depending on what you mean by some time, but—Q Like, for more than a year? [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
Rodgers, supra.The court then goes on to explain that[i]n the fall of 2011, Rodgers went to his family physician, Dr. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:51 pm
Rodgers, supra.The opinion goes on to explain that[i]n the fall of 2011, Rodgers went to his family physician, Dr. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
McNeil301 N. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
This is out of the reach of most claimants. 440.13(1)(m)(n)(o)(q)(r)(s) & (6). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
This is out of the reach of most claimants. 440.13(1)(m)(n)(o)(q)(r)(s) & (6). [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:54 am
My Q: why are we litigating a copyright case over a song released 45 years ago? [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 9:11 pm
Piompo Horacio D. (1991) señala: “siendo la figura de eclosión más reciente su implementación técnica no cuenta todavía con una asentada doctrina en relación a sus elementos básicos” (p. 216) Un comentario parecido es el expresado por el brasileño Afonso de Faria M, (2013) quien dice: “Así las cosas, vimos más una vez que el instituto de traslado de… [read post]
