Search for: "Query v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
As Eric mentions, the court questions whether a site that is totally off-shore can be held liable if there's no predicate act that occurs in the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
” (Here, on the defendant’s dime).United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Supreme Court, and another in Ohio state court. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 1:20 pm
If the prisoner has not been lawfully admitted to the United States, the United States Department of Homeland Security will have been notified of the prisoner’s status and confinement at the facility by its receipt of the query from the facility. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:24 pm
The Supreme Court rejected the latter scenario as unconstitutional in Ferguson v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:42 am
The United States Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, said that in adjudicating Doninger’s claims it had to determine if the school administrators involved were entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:00 pm
From the Complaint filed Sept. 12 in Konnech Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
Compare, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:45 am
But, it’s worth remembering that the issue of where, legally speaking, the United States is at war with al Qaeda remains an open one, Hamdan notwithstanding. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
China Southern Airlines] shows stylistic and reasoning flaws that do not generally appear in decisions issued by United States Courts of Appeals. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm
As the Second Circuit observed in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
, Patently-O suggested including claims in provisionals was advisable because of the CAFC decision in Phillips v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
The only question is whether asserting personal jurisdiction would be "consistent with the United States Constitution. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
In response to these queries and follow-up questions from Justices Mariana Lucero and Kaltrina Novaj, Ms. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:58 am
THE POLICE AND FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the police from fabricating evidence; that the courts still have to remind law enforcement of this basic premise speaks volumes about how intrinsic corruption is in policing throughout the country. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
This was - and is - the promise of the Confrontation Clause.For the last several years, the Supreme Court of the United States has reflected upon the meaning of confrontation without much resolution. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
Moreover, it would be wrong to focus exclusively on the FBI when it comes to Section 702: the NSA stockpiles a huge trove of data by targeting more than 240,000 foreign people and groups per year, systematically scans internet communications as they enter and leave the United States, and together with the CIA conducts backdoor searches of Americans thousands of times each year. [read post]
