Search for: "Reeve v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8, and a citizen’s group, in Upstate Citizens for Equality v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
 As the feature explains: "A closely watched trial in federal court in Atlanta, Cambridge University Press et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Canada The Court.ca blog has a post “R v Reeves: Shared computer? [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 10:02 am by Chip Merlin
—Yogi Bera _______________________________________1Estate of Minor v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
Combatting External and Internal Regulatory Capture Reeve T. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Reuters reports that the United States strongly believes that the killing was ordered by Kim Jong Un. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 8:33 am by Sasha Volokh
(My position on this supports that of the Gulf Coast Racing plaintiffs, represented by Ilan Wurman of University of Minnesota Law School, and Reeves Jordan, Greg Sapire, and Carlos Soltero of Maynard Nexsen PC.) [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]