Search for: "Robert Snyder" Results 301 - 320 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 8:02 am by Ashby Jones
Bush appointee, tends to align with the other stalwart conservatives on the bench: Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Bratspies, CUNY School of LawJason Brennan, Philosophy, Brown UniversityTalbot Brewer, Philosophy, University of VirginiaJohn Bronsteen, Loyola University ChicagoPeter Brooks, Princeton UniversityJames Robert Brown, University of TorontoSande L. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am by James Bickford
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes offers “a reminder of the real people behind the court’s cases” with a profile of Jason Pepper, the petitioner in Pepper v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 3:36 pm by J DeVoy
Phelps – read Randazza’s commentary here) means to porn – or should have meant, if the Roberts court wasn’t consciously out to limit the Court’s holding to the facts in Snyder. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm by Clark West
What is clear from reading Justice Roberts’ decision is that he and his fellow justices in the majority interpret the words and actions of Westboro Baptist Church as on a continuum with other religious voices in the public square, more outrageous and extreme, to be sure, but even so as part of the ‘public debate’ that religious voices in America have long fought to be a part of. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:37 am by Amanda Rice
”  Finally, Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick discusses the Court’s decision in Snyder v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
In my immediate response to last week's decision in Snyder, I argued that the decision had to be seen as of a piece with last term's decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am by James Bickford
”  In the New Jersey Star Ledger, John Farmer compares Justice Alito’s dissent to in Snyder to Justice Robert Jackson’s advocacy of “practical wisdom” his dissent in Terminiello v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Mirriam Seddiq
 In an opinion by Sotomayor (for herself, Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, and Alito), the Court explains that Covington's statements weren't testimonial because there was this ongoing emergency the police were concerned about and that was the "primary purpose" of the questioning. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:53 pm by Mac
” – Chief Justice Roberts Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Snyder v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:44 am by Danielle Citron
  In Snyder, Justice Roberts, speaking for the majority, underscored that speech on public affairs “occupies the highest rung of the hierarchy of First Amendment values” and thus deserves “special protection. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:15 am by Lisa McElroy
Most of the attention from this week’s opinions has been on Snyder v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
On March 2, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Snyder v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:40 am by Kali Borkoski
In an article for the Washington Post, Robert Barnes cites Justice Alito’s dissent in Snyder as another example of his willingness to “strike out on his own,” especially with regard to First Amendment issues. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:30 am by Paul Horwitz
  Shiffrin detects an air of the advocate in Roberts's opinion in Snyder, and although I agree with Roberts's opinion I can see why. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am by Jeff Gamso
I wasn't going to write about the Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]