Search for: "Rose v. Rose" Results 301 - 320 of 3,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Bernard v Proskauer Rose, LLP ; 2011 NY Slip Op 06184 ; Decided on August 4, 2011 ; Appellate Division, First Department  we see a situation in which plaintiff sues his attorneys, who defend by arguing that the plaintiff brought it all upon himself. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
A few months ago, we wrote about precisely such a case, Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Sept. 4, 2018], in which Commercial Division Justice Lawrence S. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:21 am by Claire Darbourne
This post was co-written by Sabrina English, Trainee Solicitor, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, London A recent decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has held that an employer had infringed an employee’s rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) when it dismissed him for sending private messages via a work messaging system. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:47 am by Ken Chan
That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 6:43 pm by Brian Shiffrin
A conviction for driving while intoxicated was reversed in People v Rose (__AD3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 08412 [4th Dept 11/13/09]) where the stop was baed on what the officer's bleief that he had witnesses a violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law,based on mistaken interpretation of the law. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:53 am by Karen Ainslie
The case of Transport and Allied Workers Union of South Africa v PUTCO Ltd (case no 64/15) involved a dispute at the South African Road Passenger Bargaining Council regarding wage negotiations. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 1:34 pm by Donald Dinnie
An American court has confirmed that government shutdown orders did not constitute ‘direct physical loss’ that would trigger an indemnity under the commercial insurance held by a group of restaurants (in Rose’s 1 LLC et al v Erie Insurance Exchange). [read post]