Search for: "Rules of Discipline v. Rules"
Results 301 - 320
of 4,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2014, 5:47 pm
Late last month, in Dariano v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 7:46 pm
The most controversial discipline case in Ontario recently has been Groia v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 5:58 am
” In Welch v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:13 pm
§ 1400(b), in last term's TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
In Leal v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:04 am
The International Rule of Law and the United Nations Charter Wei Shen, Evolution of Non-discriminatory Standards in China’s BITs in the Context of EU-China BIT Negotiations CommentsXiaohui Wu, Case Note: Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:16 pm
App., May 24, 2018) (setting aside Appeal Board's decision regarding Palmer's discipline and remanding for the city to produce evidence of comparable discipline and to hold a new disciplinary hearing) Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and Disease *Green v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
"The case is Cox v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:37 pm
Munley wrote in his 20-page opinion in J.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
Today, the vast majority of rules of CIL are codified: of 300 identified rules of CIL, only 13 have not been codified either in treaties or in International Law Commission instruments. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:03 pm
Supreme Court in its 1969 landmark decision, Tinker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm
Decker v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:54 am
The work speech/citizen speech distinction derives from a different Supreme Court ruling, Garcetti v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:56 am
” Schurz v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:56 am
” Schurz v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
OSHA’s lack of any rule requiring foundry employees to shower and changes clothes on-site did not bar the employees from presenting evidence as to the compensability of such activities under the FLSA, ruled a divided Seventh Circuit (DeKeyser v Thyssenkrupp Waupaca, Inc dba Waupaca Foundry, Inc, October 31, 2013, Lee, J). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 am
The case is Armstrong v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:12 am
According to Miscimarra, the Eighth Circuit in Wal-Mart Stores Inc v NLRB rejected the majority’s interpretation of “solicitation” and its bright-line rule that, unless a union card is in hand, no solicitation occurs—a contention that the majority disputed. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:15 am
The decision to segregate him was made under the relevant prison rules on the ground that it was necessary in order to maintain good order or discipline in the prison, and to protect him and other prisoners, and the rules required renewals of authorisation by the Prison Governor within time limits which were not always adhered to in the appellant’s case. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a judgment and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
