Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules"
Results 301 - 320
of 59,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 6:59 am
Facts – This case (Patterson v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am
City of New York v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Substantial evidence in this context means some credible evidence" (Matter of Maxwell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 210 AD3d 1095, 1096 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Substantial evidence in this context means some credible evidence" (Matter of Maxwell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 210 AD3d 1095, 1096 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
Relevant provisions on protecting confidential information in the UPC between the parties in the proceedings (Article 58 Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) and Rule 262A Rules of Procedure (RoP)) Article 58 UPCA sets out the ground principles for the protection of confidential information in the UPC:“To protect the trade secrets, personal data or other confidential information of a party to the proceedings or of a third party, or to prevent an abuse of evidence,… [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
Lawyers make the rules in divorce court. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:42 am
The parol evidence rule is a substantive rule of law that limits the introduction of evidence to interpret the meaning of a contractual provision. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
We begin with the framework that dominated the discussion at oral argument: the civil rule in the 1982 Supreme Court case of Nixon v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
We agree.It is well settled that "an arbitrator's rulings, unlike a trial court's, are largely unreviewable" (Matter of Falzone [New York Cent. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
We agree.It is well settled that "an arbitrator's rulings, unlike a trial court's, are largely unreviewable" (Matter of Falzone [New York Cent. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
This was made out on the evidence and therefore on a normal construction claim 1 would be infringed (we come onto validity shortly). [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
(Reason)Today, in Culley v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
In the third issue, defendant argued that admitting ten videos and five photographs of him stealing the vehicle in South Carolina was improper under Rule of Evidence 403; the court again disagreed, noting that the evidence was probative to the elements of possessing a stolen vehicle and not unduly prejudicial. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The Commissioner may accept additional evidence “upon good cause shown and such terms and conditions as the commissioner may specify” (8 NYCRR 276.5). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The Commissioner may accept additional evidence “upon good cause shown and such terms and conditions as the commissioner may specify” (8 NYCRR 276.5). [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:37 am
I was thinking about that, and the fact that not every horse could have taken Mystik Dan’s remarkable inside run to a win in the Kentucky Derby, while still musing on the summary judgment ruling in Sellers v. [read post]
