Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF L. A. Vs."
Results 301 - 320
of 554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
She discussed the (in)famous R v Sharpe on CP offences vs freedom of expression, reading in exceptions re privately held material. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 12:55 pm
Judge Gregory Todd, in the Montana 13th Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, Montana, filed this sentencing memorandum in court on February 26, 2007 in the case of State of Montana vs Andrew Scott McCormack, Cause No. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:32 am
See, e.g., Roby, Jini L., and Melanie Vincent. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:57 am
The year ahead could be very interesting and eventful. [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
MARY L. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Supreme Court's unfortunate decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners vs. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:28 am
Erotic-Expression Taxes vs. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Nagaraja, 7 NUJS L. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:36 am
See Abbott vs. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Fair Use Section 107 states, in pertinent part: “…the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies…for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting … is not an infringement of copyright. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:23 am
Many of the leading cases on the Insured vs. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Respectfully discuss difficult issues; come to see another’s point of view; imagine possibilities beyond our own short-term self-interest. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A brief review of two published monographs by Frederick L. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:41 am
While this discussion of law vs. equity may sound archaic and overly formalistic, there is one area of constitutional law where the distinction plays a major role, namely, with the right to a jury trial. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
While the statute does state that grossly negligent modifications from the public presentation are actionable, the court held that VLS’s non-touching concealment, in itself, did not rise to this level.[29] In addition to the statutory interpretation of VARA, the Second Circuit examined another VARA case to support its limited reading of the term “modify. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
The survey did not differentiate between raw milk consumed on the farm vs. purchased by a customer. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:20 am
Louis XIV of France was infamous for his view that there was no distinction between himself and the state, allegedly proclaiming “L’État, c’est moi” (“I am the State”). [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
., Appellants, vs. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
The extraordinary Ngoc Son Bui (my interview with him here) has organized a very interesting workshop (Constitutional Law of Greater China, 9-10 December 2021, Oxford Programme in Asian Laws) around essays that will be contributed to a Handbook of Constitutional Law in Greater China that is likely to become a standard in the field and an important reference for anyone interested in issues of Chinese constitutionalism (Program here). [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
” Under section 106A(c)(2), the statute explicitly states that modifications to a work of visual art resulting from the “public presentation, including lighting and placement,” do not constitute impermissible modifications unless caused by gross negligence.[28] Mere placement behind wall coverings, then, should not constitute the type of modification proscribed by VARA. [read post]
