Search for: "STATE v. SY"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2017, 6:58 pm
North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Peerless Sys. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:43 am
The CAFC case Hollmer v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In last week’s post, we explored how the case of Adnan Syed serves as a powerful vehicle to teach Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
” Baldwin Graphic Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Sys., 847 P.2d 440, 451 (Wash. 1993)). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:49 am
” SciMed Life Sys. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:13 am
Sys. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:45 am
Overrule Two-Step Process: The two-step test defined in KSM Fastening Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Epic Sys. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Epic Sys. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:52 am
Iatric Sys., Inc., No. 8:14-CV-2685, 2015 WL 3883958, at *2 (M.D. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Consequently, "overtime [*2]payments are not duly authorized or considered as salary within the meaning of General Municipal Law § 90 unless paid pursuant to 'an overtime plan setting forth in detail the terms, conditions and remuneration for such employment' " (Matter of Shames v Regan, 132 AD2d 743, 744 [3d Dept 1987] [emphasis omitted], quoting Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d at 269; see Matter of Mowry v New York… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Consequently, "overtime [*2]payments are not duly authorized or considered as salary within the meaning of General Municipal Law § 90 unless paid pursuant to 'an overtime plan setting forth in detail the terms, conditions and remuneration for such employment' " (Matter of Shames v Regan, 132 AD2d 743, 744 [3d Dept 1987] [emphasis omitted], quoting Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d at 269; see Matter of Mowry v New York… [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:16 am
FedEx Ground Package Sys. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
Sys. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:22 am
Pyott v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Hearing officer's applying an incorrect standard in making his or her determination requires the remanding of the matter for a new hearingMcGowan v New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement Sys., 2017 NY Slip Op 01751, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJames K. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:03 am
Sys. v Association of Surrogate's & Supreme Ct. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 11:00 pm
. *** SRI Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]