Search for: "Samuel D. Thomas" Results 301 - 320 of 649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2023, 7:08 am by jonathanturley
Thomas Jefferson would refer to the term of his predecessor John Adams as “the reign of the witches. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:35 am by Dennis Crouch
Thomas); Jacob Rooksby (Duquesne); Pamela Samuelson (Berkeley); Sharon Sandeen (Hamline); F.M. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
Times) Senators Klobuchar (D-MN) and Whitehouse (D-RI) took themselves out of the running, as well. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:55 am by Nicholas Mosvick
In one poem in the collection, she directly attacked slavery, asking:  “Wonder from whence my love of Freedom sprung; Whence flow these wishes for the common good/By feeling hearts alone best understood/I, young in life, by seeming cruel fate/ Was snatch’d from Afric’s fancy’d happy seat. . . [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” Justice Samuel Alito concurred in the judgment only, but indicated that if “a majority of this Court were willing to reconsider the approach we have taken for the past 84 years, I would support that effort. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At Education Week, Christina Samuels previews Endrew F. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
In Time, Thomas Wolf observes that the court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
Because nothing drives home a point like repeating it twenty times, Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, concurred with the GVRs but cautioned lower courts that “the Court’s disposition[s] of [these] petition[s] do[] not reflect any view regarding petitioner[s’] entitlement to relief. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, David Levine and Thomas Kearns discuss the court’s decision in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:52 pm by Jayesh Rathod
Justice Samuel Alito pushed Zimmer on whether an overly formalistic position could lead to absurd results. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]