Search for: "Sanders v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 7:17 am
The style of the case is Sanders v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am
Late last month, however, a First Circuit panel of the United States Court of Appeals held that Rule 702 required perscrutation of expert witness opinion, and then proceeded to perscrutate perspicaciously, in Samaan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Sanders v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:55 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Sanders) law. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
Oliver Sanders of 1 Crown Office Row represented the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has held that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Porter v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:40 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post-Grant) District Court C D California: TP tops Despatch as court rules up is not down: Despatch Industries v TP Solar (Green Patent Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Late Allergan Reduction – “The allergans” requires all allergans not just one or more: Late Allergen Reduction v Dynarex (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Mondis – Public statements by foreign… [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 6:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:49 am
There should however be a little notice somewhere to the effect that its contents are essentially United States-derived and United States-oriented. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:07 pm
[Link] Squire, Sanders & Dempsey is seeking an experienced patent agent. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:20 am
[6] Gravel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:55 am
See Lujan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
Well, on July 1, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, waded into the controversy. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm
Elizabeth Sanders (Government, Cornell), Magliocca (Law, Indiana-Indianapolis), and yours truly. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm
Contreras “made strong and aggressive arguments for the United States, but he also was open to listening to counter arguments and to our side,” Robinson said. [read post]
