Search for: "Seals v. May*"
Results 301 - 320
of 412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2009, 9:23 pm
No such proposals should be made that would require the violation of a collective bargaining agreement currently in force.G I V E N under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this twentieth day of February in the year two thousand nine.David A. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 5:40 am
And second, the confidence and security clients will feel as they await the jury’s verdict in their double homicide knowing that their lawyer flashed his wearable tech during summation, blowing away every hipster selected to seal his fate. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 10:01 pm
It is USA v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 6:05 pm
") After the Supreme Court authorized Southern states to start using their police powers to enforce the color line--that was the meaning of Plessy v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:58 am
” (For an American example of that, see United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 1:04 am
Disney Withdraws its Trademark Registration Applications for SEAL TEAM 6 [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:10 am
" As we know only too well from Connick v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:51 pm
” Neither the statute nor the Supreme Court have defined the term or who may invoke it, but in NBC v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:11 pm
Declaring its commitment to fulfill the Supreme Court’s order last June 12 in Boumediene v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
A Political Autobiography; Lester Julius’ Look Out Whitey, Black Power’s Gon Get Your Mama; Bobby Seale, Seize the Time: The Story of the Black Panther Party and Huey P. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:13 am
” FCC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:11 am
The syringes recalled were from a number of lots where there was a concern that unit package seal integrity may have been compromised for some of them. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the place within the jurisdiction of which the crime was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offence for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V An accused person shall not be extradited, under the provisions of this Treaty, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause under the laws of the State asking extradition, he is exempt from prosecution or punishment on account of the punishable act for which extradition is asked. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:00 am
Büchel and the 5Pointz Michelangelos v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:39 am
Hoggard v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Maybe to this we can add in Dastar. [read post]
