Search for: "Seaman v. Seaman" Results 301 - 320 of 691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2014, 2:27 pm by Steven Boutwell
President Lines, Ltd., 318 U.S. 660, 669 (1943), ruled that a shipowner could be liable to a Jones Act seaman for harm suffered as the result of any negligence on the part of the ship’s doctor while treating the seaman. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 5:00 am by Dan Hoerner
The latest McBride ruling is in keeping with the general pronouncement of the Supreme Court’s Miles v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:40 am by David DePaolo
This morning's WorkCompCentral story about the recent California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's Significant Panel Decision in Bodam v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:42 am by Beard Stacey & Jacobsen, LLP
An Alaska crab fisherman aboard the F/ V ICY MIST has been medivaced for medical treatment after a crab pot fell on him Sunday. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am by Amy Howe
Association of Maryland Pilots, which had asked the Court to consider whether boat maintenance work counts towards the minimum required to sue as a “seaman” under the Jones Act Panetti v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:07 am by Amy Howe
” [Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., represents the petitioners in Kirby v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
Latsis thirty-percent rule—that, ordinarily, a qualifying “seaman” under the Jones Act must spend thirty percent or more of his time in service of a vessel in navigation—a court may consider the time a [read post]