Search for: "Sears, Roebuck and Co." Results 301 - 320 of 338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm by Bexis
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 35 Conn. 687, 406 A.2d 1254 (1979) (cited in Cassisi, 396 So.2d at 1150) (emphasis supplied).Cases involving complex pharmaceutical products, which carry inherent risks, are inapposite. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
During the opening decades of the 20th century, it was second only to Sears, Roebuck and Company in net mail-order retail sales. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
Sears Roebuck, 421 U.S. 132, 150-53 (1975)(recognizing the deliberative process privilege, but limiting it to pre-decisional documents); EPA v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:06 pm
  Sears, Roebuck & Co. 337 NLRB 443, 443 (2002). [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by John Elwood
During the bankruptcy of defunct retailer Sears, Roebuck & Co., the bankruptcy court authorized Sears to sell substantially all its assets to respondent Transform Holdco LLC, including its lease in the Twin Cities’ Mall of America. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:29 am by Thomas B. Alleman
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 6 24 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 2010)(Posner, J.), and issued a preliminary rule in May 2016. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:29 am by Thomas B. Alleman
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 6 24 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 2010)(Posner, J.), and issued a preliminary rule in May 2016. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 647 A.2d 454 (N.J. 1994). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-06-01539-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-29-08)08-0272 DEALERS ELECTRICAL SUPPLY CO. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
She has spent time as a federal prosecutor, a law firm attorney and in-house counsel at several major corporations, including MCI Communications Corp. and Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 386 F.3d 21, 35 (1st Cir. 2004)(holding that trial court erred in allowing crossexamination and final argument on expert witness’s supposed failure to produce all working notes and videotaped recordings while conducting tests, when objecting party never made such document requests). [read post]