Search for: "Shah v. Shah"
Results 301 - 320
of 605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
Franke, Opinion of Justice Katherine Franke in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:00 pm
Larkin v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:57 am
Both Miami v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 3:00 am
As this Morris James blog explains: Larkin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 1:57 pm
Shah, C.A. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
Larkin v Shah, C.A. 10918-VCS (August 25, 2016) This is one of two recent Court of Chancery decisions explaining that the Corwin case really does mean that there is an “irrebuttable business judgment rule” that bars challenges to a merger approved by a majority of the fully-informed, disinterested and uncoerced stockholders, in the absence of the deal involving a controlling stockholder who suffers from a conflict in the merger. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
(Last Thursday, he read at length from his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
In the case of Ahmed v Shah (2015) the issuing of a cheque for the returned deposit that wasn’t accepted by the tenant was deemed to have not been returned but in the later case of Yeomans v Newell (2016) the cheque satisfied the court that the deposit had been returned. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 2:41 pm
Comment This appears to be the exact opposite of the finding in Ahmed v Shah. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:22 am
Rauner, June 7, 2016, Shah, M.). [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:53 pm
Shah. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm
Daniel Green v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
OMH subsequently adopted a permanent regulation that incorporated the mandatory mask-wearing requirement into its Rules concerning preventing influenza transmission [see 14 NYCRR 509].** In Matter of Spence v Shah, 136 AD3d 1242, the Appellate Division determined that the DOH regulation was not arbitrary, capricious, irrational or contrary to law.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_02696.htm [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 6:47 am
New Holland Logansport, Inc., March 9, 2016, Shah, N.). [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:18 am
Vohrer, In re Chagos Marine Protected Area (Mauritius v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
Supreme Court and appellate practitioner Pratik Shah filed the brief on behalf Ethicon. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:54 am
Metra, February 8, 2016, Shah, M.). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:05 am
The sign that appears above is registered as a trade mark for Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products; edible oils and fats; prepared meals; soups and potato crisps; canned foodstuffs; pizza toppings; preparations for making pizza toppings; dried preparations for use [read post]
