Search for: "Smith v. Grant et al"
Results 301 - 320
of 495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
Autonomy Corp., PLC, et. al., 2-11-cv-00201 (VAED June 9, 2011, Order) (Smith, J.). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:56 am
(Patent Docs) Escitalopram – Australia: Patent office grants 121 month extension of time: Alphapharm Pty Ltd & Ors v H. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
The Court nevertheless granted the case. ** In Hall, et al., v . [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
Smith, 10-1115 (fourth); Reynolds v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm
I.Cambridge University Press et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:47 pm
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
Amicus brief of National Association of Legal Investigators et al. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
Title: Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Ninth Circuit Public and Community Defenders et al. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
Smith at his EDTexweblog discussing Judge Ron Clark's grant of the plaintiff's Motion for Prejudgment Interest in the Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
The Court granted cert. in Judulang v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
PEARLMAN, et al., Debtor. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm
The Commission generally does not grant extensions that would exceed 90 days from the original due date. [read post]
