Search for: "Smith v. Standard Life" Results 301 - 320 of 799
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2017, 8:33 am
The Board, annulling the decision of the Cancellation Division, declared the invalidity of EUTM 11775509 ‘TOBBIA’.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 165 [week ending 1 October] German Federal Court of Justice rules that GS Media presumption of knowledge does not apply to Google Images I Images search service I Life as an IP Lawyer: Washington, D.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm by Shea Denning
(Jessie Smith wrote about that requirement here.) [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
Florida, which held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits sentencing juvenile offenders to life in prison without parole for crimes other than murder, did not clearly prohibit Virginia’s program that allowed eventual “geriatric release. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Arizona‘s standards from the eligibility phase into that weighing phase. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am by Aurora Barnes
Arizona‘s standards from the eligibility phase into that weighing phase. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
The state asserts that there is a circuit split over whether a sentence qualifies as a “life sentence” under Graham if offenders are eligible for parole at age 60. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017)I have just posted a preliminary draft of an article that is currently entitled The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View from International Law and Standards. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  And though Klarman makes a convincing case that the ratification process that followed was hardly a model of democratic deliberation, he concedes that this process was at least “reasonably democratic” when judged by the standards of the time. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Jane’s history of her inner life is very different from the character study that John would write. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
Interestingly, Graham Colditz has elsewhere asserted that an increased risk of disease cannot be translated into the “but-for” standard of causation10: “Knowledge that a factor is associated with increased risk of disease does not translate into the premise that a case of disease will be prevented if a specific individual eliminates exposure to that risk factor. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:49 am by John Elwood
The petitioner in Smith v. [read post]