Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Civil Cases" Results 301 - 320 of 1,153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Louis, No. 06-3349 In a case arising out of the reorganization of the City of St. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:58 am
But subjects who were instructed to apply a standard reflecting one or another of these "reform" standards were as likely (around 45%) to find the Berkowitz defendant innocent as subjects instructed to apply the traditional common law definition. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:13 pm by David Kravets
Jammie Thomas-Rasset testifies in her first civil trial in 2007, while U.S. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:23 am by John Floyd
  Tales of Political Corruption, Convictions are Instructive   1001 False Statements   First, there is the case of Lee Baca, the former Sheriff of Los Angeles County. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:29 pm by Marcia Shein
The main question in the case concerns whether the defendant’s first lawyer was ineffective for not challenging a jury instruction. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm by Florian Mueller
And it may be very difficult or even impossible for a court to do under general rules of civil procedure and its own local rules, but for the Rule 50 motions in this case it would actually make sense to give Samsung at least (!) [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 8:00 am
As the California Civil Jury Instructions explain, “common carriers” are companies that are in the business of transporting the general public or their property. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
The challenger must identify a standard of care, and the challenged witness’s deviation(s) from that standard. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:58 pm
        Samuels repeatedly emphasized the possibility of giving a limiting instruction, telling the jury not to use the statement for its truth but only in support of the opinion, and the fact that the defense in this case never asked for one. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm by Schachtman
The Court of Appeals held, in a two to one decision, that the statute required a “but for” jury instruction, reversed and remanded. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
The court largely used standard instructions in a case that was anything but standard. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:41 am
A civil jury can be firmly convinced it is more likely than not that a tort was committed. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Jacob Schulz
A grand jury in March 2010 indicted the nine Hutaree members on two counts of standard firearms charges—but also for attempted use of weapons of mass destruction and seditious conspiracy. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:52 am by Paul Weiland
  The McKittrick policy directs Department of Justice attorneys who prosecute Endangered Species Act (ESA) cases to request jury instructions that prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant knew the biological identity of the animal taken. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:56 pm
My favorite instruction is this one, which has an analogue in civil trials of an instruction to the jury that the number of witnesses or length of testimony is not a relevant factor in assessing which side should prevail: Although the government is required to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, the government is not required to present all possible evidence related to the case or to produce all possible witnesses who might have some… [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:42 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
The appellate court stated that here, the plaintiffs wanted their civil engineer to testify as to the standard of care that applies to apartment managers. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 9:44 am by Douglas Melcher
Standardized Civil Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia § 22.14 (2011 rev. ed.). [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 10:35 am by Daniel A. Burton, Esq.
., the Court differentiated between the standards of proof associated with an domestic violence action in the Family Part and a civil action in the Law Division. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am by Phil Dixon
The trial judge instructed the jury not to consider the informant’s statements on the phone call for the truth of the matter asserted, but only for context of the defendant’s statements on the call. [read post]