Search for: "State of Oregon Employment Department" Results 301 - 320 of 829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by David Kim, FordHarrison
Did you know that Oregon just passed a law on July 22, 2019, that requires an employer to notify its employees when the employer is contacted by a federal agency that intends to audit any employer records that are used to verify identity and employment eligibility? [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 12:55 pm by Ryan Kunkel and Karen O'Connor
Employers that already provide benefits equivalent to or greater than the state program may be exempt from Oregon’s new requirements. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Amanda M. Gómez
The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment is charged with issuing warnings and orders of compliance for violations and has the authority to issue civil penalties for subsequent violations. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Clark In the last year, Maryland, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Washington State passed game-changing laws that restrict the enforceability of provisions between an employer and an employee that limit the employee’s post-termination ability to work in competition with the employer. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The committee launched an inquiry of Wehrum after it was reported that questions had been raised about his compliance with President Trump’s ethics pledge, which requires political appointees to recuse themselves from specific matters involving their former employers and clients for two years. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:05 pm by Naomi Shatz
 Many of these cases rely on the theory of “sex stereotyping,” which was developed in the Title VII employment discrimination context. [read post]
Oregon: $12.50 Portland metro area; $11.25 urban counties; $11.00 rural counties on 7/1/19. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 10:31 am by Cannabis Law Group
That’s according to an advisory opinion from a department attorney, who added states already should not ban or impede the transport of hemp grown legally per a 2014 law. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:10 am by Jason Shinn
Let me explain: First, giving a departing employee a copy of his or her non-compete or other post-employment restrictions should be every employer’s practice. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:10 am by Jason Shinn
Let me explain: First, giving a departing employee a copy of his or her non-compete or other post-employment restrictions should be every employer’s practice. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 8:20 am by Daniel J. Green
Pursuant to a recently passed Oregon state law (HB 2992), noncompete agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2020 will only be enforceable against Oregon employees if the employer provides the departing employee with a signed copy of the agreement within 30 days after the employee’s date of termination. [read post]
31 May 2019, 1:12 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Manufacturers employed about 189,000 people in 2017, accounting for about 11.9 percent of all private-sector employment in Oregon. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7739. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
7 May 2019, 11:11 am by Jon L. Gelman
 For example, the Oregon Supreme Court refused to classify a worker as an employee for the purpose of workers’ compensation even though the employe was classified as employees for the purpose of state wage and hour laws. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]