Search for: "State v Barrett"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,945
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
As Justice Barrett explained in Biden v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:38 am
In its rush to give the Republican Party the victory that it had most wanted for decades, the Court allowed the State of Mississippi to dramatically broaden what it was asking the Court to do after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and was replaced by Justice Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 8:38 am
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett at the University of Minnesota as a small group of attendees protested the high court's 2022 overturning of Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Bremeton School District, and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am
Children learn early on in their education that the United States Government is one of separated powers. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
On October 3, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
On October 3, the second morning of its new term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:21 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:59 pm
In so doing, Judge Kethledge relied heavily on an en-banc dissent written by then-Judge Barrett in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Our nomination for the most intriguing case of the last Supreme Court term is Mallory v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm
The majority opinion by Justice Barrett, and concurring arguments by Justice Gorsuch, addressed questions about Congressional power over Indian affairs, tribal sovereignty, and equal protection. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman for 25 years. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 12:39 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
