Search for: "State v. Cross #2"
Results 301 - 320
of 7,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm
Finally, the Court held that the shackling of Ayala during her non-jury sentencing was not an abuse of discretion.United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:04 am
, No. 111438 (Va., 3/2/12). [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:51 pm
In Hofmann v Sender,--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 1955846 (C.A.2) the Petitioner–Appellee father initiated proceedings for return of his children to Canada. petitioner Adam Hofmann was a Canadian citizen. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Filed 2/26/08 The Upper Deck Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:15 am
Sept. 2, 2009) (No. 08-1022) Read more [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
The answer to this question might depend on how you view the recent South Carolina Supreme Court's ("SCSCT") Holy Cross v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
GAT v LuK) and Case C-539/03 Roche Nederland BV and Others v Frederick Primus and Milton Goldenberg (noted here by the IPKat). [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:20 pm
Court of Appeal Reverses a Judgment Sustaining a Demurrer by Blue CrossCoast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:09 am
Rostad v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:49 pm
In Thompson v Leben Home for Adults, the court stated that in the absence of such a good cause showing, the court has no discretion to entertain even a meritorious, non-prejudicial cross motion for summary judgment. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:45 am
") SC18391 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Boumediene v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:33 pm
The ranching company also entered into a lease with the State for the abutting property that the ditch crossed. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution assures the defendant the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:05 am
See Patterson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:08 am
Section 929P(b)(2) provide extraterritorial effect for these types actions when certain defined types of conduct take place in the United States or when it takes place outside the United States with a foreseeable effect in the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:10 am
Ct., Nassau Co., decided 2/25/2009) In October 2007, the Second Department modified Nassau Supreme's order to deny plaintiff's motion and State Farm's cross motion for summary judgment, holding that State Farm had not proven the assignor's intoxication as a matter of law. [read post]
