Search for: "State v. D. C. F."
Results 301 - 320
of 5,794
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2017, 7:10 pm
DEA (S.D.N.Y.) -- determining that: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration properly relied on Exemptions 7(C), 7(D), 7(E), or 7(F) to withhold records concerning plaintiff; (2) agency properly denied fee waiver request because disclosure would primarily benefit only plaintiff; (3) agency properly invoked Exemptions 6 and 7(C) to categorically withhold records about third parties.Sarno v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:57 am
Smith, 899 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1993), the Fifth Circuit upheld the search of apartment 15-D where the search warrant specified apartment 15-C based upon incorrect information provided by the CI. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 5:13 pm
§ 3553(f), which exempts covered offenses from mandatory-minimum sentences such as the 10-year terms each of them received. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
§ 5321(a)(5)(C)(i) (2004), supersedes 31 C.F.R. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:38 am
LEXIS 70425 (D. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
The state's position is that the district court decision settles every issue decided between the parties for the purpose of retrial, so if that court says the prisoner is right on claim A but wrong on B, C, D, E, and F, he has to appeal a decision he won if he doesn't want what he believes to be errors on B through F repeated at the retrial. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:50 am
State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 2:57 pm
O’Neal, 778 F.3d 767, 774(9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Eminence Capital, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
Pulliam, 405 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
The third category consisted of a single document, an ICE memorandum titled “ICE Ability to Use 212(a)(3)(C) Foreign Policy Charge. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
