Search for: "State v. D. U."
Results 301 - 320
of 2,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2008, 3:27 pm
James D. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:59 am
Drake v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 10:12 am
For those following the proceedings in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:50 am
Several of the states that sought to intervene in the case before the D. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:37 am
D-. 3d 433 I 434 (1st Dep’ t 2018) . [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am
Kaufman v Boies Schiller Flexner LLP2022 NY Slip Op 32743(U) August 15, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 154149/2018 Judge: James d’Auguste is the very fraught story of a massively fought matrimonial action. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
Jan. 31, 2008):As stated above, a writ of habeas corpus will not be issued unless the state court's legal conclusions are "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States," 28 U .S.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
") (quoting United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
United States, 295 U. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 11:19 am
The second challenge, United States Postal Service v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:14 am
What d ya say I. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 9:42 am
(d) Yeager v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
§1098ee(2)(D). [read post]
26 May 2019, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 4:04 am
In Zegelstein v The Roth Law Firm PLLC 2020 NY Slip Op 30581(U) February 28, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154224/2018 Judge: W. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Washington, 326 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
(d) The structure of Section 36B itself also suggests that tax credits are not limited to State Exchanges. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Matter of Verizon NY, Inc. v Mills, 2007 NY Slip Op 52616(U), Decided on August 10, 2007, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Judge Robert M. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:46 pm
v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
The dissent does not consider itself bound by Cuozzo's conclusion that §314(d) bars appeal of "questions that are closely tied to the application and interpretation of statutes related to the Patent Office's decision to initiate inter partes review," 579 U. [read post]
