Search for: "State v. Harm"
Results 301 - 320
of 25,754
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: An assumption that dominates the discourse on race in the United States is that racial subjugation is only harmful to the subjugated. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
From yesterday's Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Matt Stoller explains U.S. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
MARBURY V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:56 am
Mekhail v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:53 am
Good Meat Project v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
Corner Post got this case to the Supreme Court by alleging a circuit split between Herr v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:35 am
The court’s denial of review in Mckesson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:42 am
They lack standing to sue.The case is Citizens United to Protect our Neighborhoods v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The case – SEC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:02 pm
Other countries that have similar legal frameworks to the UK include Australia, New Zealand and Canada, as well as the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am
In this regard, precedent from the United States Supreme Court, in Ruckelhaus v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 4:52 pm
Footnotes[+] Footnotes ↑1 Strain v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:30 pm
That there was a threat of present/future death or physical harm, That the accused reasonably believed the threat would be carried out, That the accused had no safe way to avoid the harm, That it is because of the threat that the accused did what they did, and That the harm that the accused caused was not disproportionate to the harm that was threatened against the accused. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
This is a defence that states that the accused was wrongfully convicted. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:57 am
Emphasis on Individual Accountability to Protect the Markets To encourage a compliance culture, Associate Director Stacy Bogert stated that the SEC will seek clawbacks of executive compensation under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 304. [read post]
