Search for: "State v. Humphrey"
Results 301 - 320
of 448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
The case is Sabrina Hart, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
United States, 14-419. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
The cases were filed by: A medical transcriptionist terminated for tardiness and absenteeism due to her obsessive-compulsive disorder (Humphrey v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
Humphrey Fellow, American University Washington College of Law; Defense Counsel to Nigerian defendant Amina Lawal Sujata V. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Humphrey. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:12 am
After the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in All American Check Cashing, the Fifth Circuit granted the petition for en banc review in Collins v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:48 am
In Walker v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Humphrey bars her retaliation claim. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Humphrey, 14-8349, two relists after arrival of the record before it won its grant. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
Francisco acknowledged that the Supreme Court’s 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 9:36 am
Beck gave a CLE presentation to the Lubbock Area Bar Association titled “United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am
That sturdy precedent was the Court’s decision in the case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
Humphrey’s article “Let’s Talk About Sex”: Legislating and Educating on the Affirmative Consent Standard is cited in the following article: Ruthy Lowenstein Lazar, Epistemic Twilight Zone of Consent, 30 S. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
This modest slap on the wrist is strong evidence that the current conservative Justices will not take on the constitutional status of independent agencies, which were accepted in Humphrey’s Executor v, United States (1935), even though these could be challenged on the ground that the so-called “fourth branch” of government does not fit into the tripartite constitutional structure with its legislative, executive, and judicial branches. [read post]
