Search for: "State v. Hurdle" Results 301 - 320 of 2,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2022, 7:35 am by Eve Brensike Primus
The decision will make it marginally harder for state prisoners to obtain relief, because they will have to jump over two hurdles rather than one, but it is unlikely to affect the outcome in most cases. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:09 am by SHG
While the Supreme Court in  Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am by Riana Harvey
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 7:54 am by Christopher G. Hill
  A recent case out of the Western District of Virginia, Marroquin v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
First, a member or shareholder seeking an accounting must establish that a pre-suit demand for such an accounting was made and refused (New York Studios, Inc. v Steiner Digital Studios, 151 AD3d 454, 455 [1st Dept 2017] [“In the absence of an allegation that plaintiffs demanded an accounting, the claim for an accounting fails to state a cause of action”]; Mawere v Landau, 130 AD3d 986, 990 [2d Dept 2015] [“The complaint failed to state a cause of… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:57 am by Florian Mueller
In one of the most important antitrust cases in the history of our industry, the Google Android case (one of several pending Google v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
But Lawson couldn’t meet the final hurdle—to prove the company’s reason was a pretext—so his case was dismissed. [read post]