Search for: "State v. Owen"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
New York State, 2013 U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:31 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rakib, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 870 (01 April 2011) Adam & Anor, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 865 (01 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Owens v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 359 (31 March 2011) Haresign v Clydesdale Bank Plc (t/a Yorkshire Bank) [2011] EWCA Civ 344 (01 April 2011) Eliassen & Anor v Eliassen & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 361 (01 April 2011) Chater, R (on the… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:34 am
See Owens v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 10:54 am
And given the tenor of yesterday’s oral argument, it is difficult to believe that Duncan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 9:11 pm
” Haro v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-130 Title: Owens v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:17 am
Aristocrat Techs. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 2:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Owen, 563 N.E.2d 605, 608; State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:13 am
App. 1990), and Gasque v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 5:00 pm
" Last month Owen filed a motion asking the high court to vacate the writs of certiorari it granted in both of his Texas death row clients' two consolidated cases: Brewer v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Christopher Owens is a third-year law student at New York University Sch [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:38 pm
The 45-page opinion in Owens v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 11:23 am
The cases are Brewer v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Berger, Poetry, Mercy, and the Phenomenology of Justice, (Forthcoming in Ehud Ben Zvi, Claudia V. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:00 am
The court disagreed and rejected this branch of Member’s appeal.In Owens v McGuire, 121 AD2d 292, the Appellate Division said that the doctrine of estoppel can only be applied “against a governmental entity if failure to apply the doctrine would defeat a right legally and rightfully obtained. [read post]
