Search for: "State v. Pickering"
Results 301 - 320
of 432
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2011, 4:50 am
The “Pickering test” [Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563] is used to determine if a public employee has been unlawfully dismissed from his or her employment for “engaging in speech. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:29 am
" The Maryland Court of Appeals ruling in Stephens v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:32 am
(See, e.g., Levin v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:24 am
Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563, sets out the tests applied by the courts in such cases. . [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:31 am
Rather, the court must still engage in Pickering-type balancing. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
Ceballos and Pickering v Board of Education, Turley suggested that Cox would have a strong case for arguing that his firing was a violation of First Amendment rights. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
“In Jones v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:01 am
In Comm'n on Ethics of the State of Nevada v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
The actual damage requirement was discussed by the United States Supreme Court in Gertz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
Reasons for judgement were released recently in the case of McLintock v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:12 am
Coalition for Economic Equity v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:42 am
Anemone even acknowledged that prior to his contacts with the Times, he knew his job was in jeopardy.Finally, since Anemone misrepresented the evidence in speaking with the Times, management probably had the right to fire him under Pickering v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:15 pm
Carrigan (Granted )Docket: 10-568Issue(s): Whether the First Amendment subjects state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny, the balancing test of Pickering v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Pereira, a social worker, was terminated after making remarks that she, herself, described as a stupid, racist, and unthinking joke.While citing a line of cases that included Pickering v Board of Education, 31 U.S. 563, and Connick v Meyers, 461 U.S. 138, 1983, the Massachusetts high court said that although a public employee’s speech may be entitled to constitutional protection if the employee speaks out on a matter of public concern, and his or her interests as a… [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
The Nevada Supreme Court has upheld an earlier ruling in Bahena v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:38 am
Since its recognition of the right of public employees to speak on matters of public concern in Pickering v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
