Search for: "State v. Reagan"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
Sale, reviewed a decision by President Clinton, following the lead of Presidents Reagan and Bush, to use §1182(f) to interdict inadmissible foreign nationals who had taken to the high seas in unsafe vessels in hopes of reaching the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
Sale, reviewed a decision by President Clinton, following the lead of Presidents Reagan and Bush, to use §1182(f) to interdict inadmissible foreign nationals who had taken to the high seas in unsafe vessels in hopes of reaching the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
“In determining the existence of diversity jurisdiction, a corporation is a citizen of both its state of incorporation and the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:50 am
The Great Turnback of grants and regulatory discretion to the states was a product of two former governors -- Reagan and Clinton -- with such notable (or infamous, if you are so inclined) measures as TANF, expansion of section 1115 Medicaid waivers, Lopez/Morrison/Gonzales v Oregon judicial vindication of state power, etc. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
That is the threat posed by state power in our century. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:31 am
In an effort to appeal to non-Democratic voters, Doug Elmets, a Republican and member of the Reagan administration, channeled Senator Lloyd Bentsen’s famous debate retort, stating: “I knew Ronald Reagan; I worked for Ronald Reagan; Donald Trump, you are no Ronald Reagan” Perhaps the biggest surprise hit of the evening was Khizr Khan’s speech about the patriotism of American Muslims. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 11:10 am
Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 2:15 pm
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
A few months later the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Furman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Icon at Panorama, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 2:00 pm
On January 29, 2019, in Procopio v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 1:15 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
In Collins v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
The article responds to an argument between New York Times columnists David Brooks and Paul Krugman over the racial meaning of "states' rights," a term that Reagan used in the speech he gave at the fair. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
In Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Both observed that DOMA is constitutionally infirm to the extent that it reflects a bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group, an interest deemed impermissible in Romer v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
That allowed O'Connor, also an appointee of Ronald Reagan, to avoid casting a vote to outright reverse her Bowers v. [read post]
