Search for: "State v. Rivera"
Results 301 - 320
of 713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2014, 6:30 pm
byJill Paperno, author ofRepresenting the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseIn People v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:58 pm
People v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:53 am
Justice Smith filed a separate concurring opinion, while Justice Rivera dissented (Santer v Board of Education of East Meadow Union Free School District, May 6, 2014, Abdus-Salaam, S). [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
” In contrast, Justice Rivera dissented, stating that “I dissent from the majority's decision because I can find no legal or factual error in the Appellate Division's application of the Pickering balancing test to the facts of these cases. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:39 am
Related Blog Posts:Massachusetts Insurance Company Liable for All Tort-Related Costs in Unfair and Deceptive Settlement Case — Rivera v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
Justice Rivera issued a concurring opinion commenting stating “I agree that petitioner Subway Surface Supervisors Association's (SSSA) claims under the Federal and State Equal Protection Clauses should be dismissed. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
Rivera, 2014 U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
The court held that the failure to pursue a particular pretrial remedy does not, ipso facto, demonstrate ineffectiveness in People v Rivera. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 11:32 am
See Baber v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 12:39 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:06 am
Netherlands Insurance Company v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
The case, EPA v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Luis Rivera Pagán, el Lcdo. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Padilla v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:41 am
Rejecting the notion that applying the general FLSA regulation for reimbursement of travel expenses on top of the specific H-2A rule would render the latter superfluous, the Ninth Circuit revived a claim for immigration and travel expenses brought by H-2A workers whose expenses in procuring employment and traveling to the United States dropped their pay below the minimum wage (Rivera Rivera v Peri & Sons Farms, Inc, November 13, 2013, O’Scannlain, D). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 12:30 am
Deliberations continue today in State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:59 pm
The Court of Appeals, in People v Clermont (2013 NY Slip Op 06806 [10/22/13]) the defense suppression motion said defendant had been stopped due to an MVA when no car was involved. [read post]
