Search for: "State v. Singh "
Results 301 - 320
of 619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2017, 4:53 pm
On 11 August 2017, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the libel case of Singh v Weayou [2017] EWHC 2102 (QB). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 2:26 pm
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Tata Sons Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:20 am
The order was made in the proceedings of a batch of civil writ petitions dubbed Rakesh Vaishnav & Ors. v Union of India challenging the constitutional validity of the three farm laws as well as the validity of the protests by the farmers against these laws. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
In Gurbachan Singh & Another v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
“The State cannot use criminal defamation cases to throttle democracy,” he observed. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
; Jedediah Britton-Purdy David Singh Grewal Thanks to Jack Balkin for letting us comment on his Cycles of Constitutional Time. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:53 am
Singhal v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:28 am
Facts: This case (Junger, et al v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
The IPKat has stumbled across a decision earlier this year from the Federal Court, Canada, in Pfizer Canada Inc. v Pharmascience Inc. 2013 FC 120, dating back to 4 February. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am
The judge confirmed that the standard of review in this case was irrationality, as set out by Singh J (as he then was) in R(May) v Birmingham CC (2012) EWCA 1399 (Admin). [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
See, e.g., Singh v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:18 pm
Some other notable decisions: Singh v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
” [Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in Perry.] [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
On the same day Master Cook struck out the claim in the case of Singh v Grief to Grace [2022] EWHC 2999 (KB) after hearing the claimant’s applications (i) for an anonymity order and (ii) to amend the claim form and particulars of claim. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
SPEAK is represented by Swathi Sukumar, an IP counsel and director of i-Probono and Mr Chander Uday Singh, a senior counsel. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:22 am
He summarizes three cases reaching three results: Mehraban v. [read post]
