Search for: "Supervisors v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
On June 17, 2010 the United States Supreme Court issued the highly anticipated decision City of Ontario v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
In Vance v Ball State University, the 5-4 majority endorsed a narrow definition of the meaning of “supervisor” for purposes of determining employer liability under Title VII. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:30 pm
utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CCH-Workday+%28WK+WorkDay%29 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, rules supervisors of county employee are immune from lawsuit alleging deliberate indifference to a known workplace dangerBy Lorene D. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 6:47 am
United Farm Bureau Mut. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:09 pm
In Wilson v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 4:00 am
Including proposed staffing changes in a plan to close schools submitted to the State Education Department does not cloak the staffing issues as a state policy, law or regulation thereby precluding submitting the matter to arbitration Board of Educ.of the City Sch. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:07 pm
Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 74 (1972), that no fundamental right to housing exists under the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:50 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:05 am
In In re Higgs v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:36 pm
One explicitly stated that he thought the plaintiff was untruthful. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:55 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently affirmed in part and reversed in part the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am
“Under the majority’s test,” Justice Sotomayor wrote, “four wrongs apparently make a right.” Conclusion In largely sidestepping the second, broader question on which certiorari was granted – whether Malley and its exclusionary-rule corollary, United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Glenn, supra.The Court of Appeals goes on to explain how and why the prosecution arose, what it involved and why Glenn was convicted:Defendant, an officer with the United States Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), worked at the Canada–United States border in Detroit, Michigan, during the relevant year of 2013. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
The majority opinion, after 14 pages of opining how the ATS does not apply to human rights violations occurring outside the United States, added: “[o]n these facts, all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
Second, the United States Supreme Court has "insisted that the discretion of the official in the field be circumscribed as held in Delaware v Prouse. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
