Search for: "T Ramsey"
Results 301 - 320
of 823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 6:48 am
Enbridge hasn’t contributed to Porter. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:01 am
The little girl couldn’t wait to see Grandma and tell her all about it. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of the legislation. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:10 pm
Know something we don't? [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 2:32 pm
But most immigration restrictionists probably don’t assign a lot of weight to that possibility to begin with. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:33 am
In particular, reliable scholars like Mike Ramsey have made powerful arguments that the vesting clause of Article II confers substantive and substantial power on the President. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 7:07 am
This Dave Ramsey. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
(There's still some chance there won't be 60 votes for the Senate to proceed to a disapproval vote, in which case there won't even be any occasion for a veto.) [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:39 pm
Ramsey: Not a lot of papers, good to see what people are working on. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
Q: difference b/t irrational and uninformed. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
Lisa Ramsey: Line drawing: who do we ask? [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:07 am
But the Iran deal:doesn’t look like a nonbinding agreement. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:50 am
Ramsey goes through all the different ways in which the deal might become constitutionally valid, but concludes that it isn’t likely to satisfy any of them. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
You won’t find this one on the SAT’s. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
Professor Mike Ramsey has an interesting response to my previous post on constraint vs deference: The problem with judicial restraint (meaning simply deference to legislative majorities) as an interpretive philosophy is that it isn’t an interpretive philosophy. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:39 am
It isn’t just originalism whose utility is instrumental, but that of law more generally. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:49 am
Ramsey also suggests that even if “originalism generally may promote liberty, presumably it doesn’t always do so. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:58 pm
Ramsey is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law and Director of the International & Comparative Law Programs at the University of San Diego Law School. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
” Responding to this has been excellent posts by Michael Ramsey, Ilya Somin and Evan Bernick. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
I agree with nearly all of Ramsey’s analysis. [read post]
