Search for: "Thomas v. White"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Thomas & Ors v Bridgend County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 862This Court of Appeal case might be rather limited on its facts, but there are some broader issues and it is interesting. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:37 am
White, 548 U.S. 53, 65 (2006) [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:56 am
The outcome in Justice Clarence Thomas’ opinion for the 5-3 majority in Utah v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Thomas T. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Women of color suffer even higher rates of abuse than white women. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 pm
Oliveira, and Justice Thomas with opinion in Stokeling v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 11:06 am
Seaton v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 2:55 pm
The new decision, in the case of Cooper v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Problems with Justice Thomas’s OriginalismJustice Thomas’s critique of Times v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:17 am
" More on the Thomas Miller-El's case is at: The Legacy of Henry Wade More on Miller-El Miller-El Case Ends With Plea Agreement More on Miller-El v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
From today's order and accompanying opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:50 am
Cuomo v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:01 am
In Worcester v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:54 am
In Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:10 pm
In June, the Supreme Court effectively ended considerations of race in college admissions in their decision from the Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
