Search for: "U. S. Patent and Trademark Office"
Results 301 - 320
of 390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 3:13 pm
The Patent and Trademark Office would be in the impossible situation of granting a valid patent that necessarily infringed another patent by its mere issuance. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
And with 2024 (September 24th) being the 40th anniversary of the enactment of the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Amendments—the statute that amended Title 35 of the United States Code to create PTEs for certain FDA-regulated products—and a recent spate of PTE-related items posted on regulations.gov, we thought we would peruse some decisions to see what’s up at the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) PTE-wise. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office Symposium on Trends in Alternative Dispute Resolution Concerning Intellectual Property Rights Litigation. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:03 pm
Caraco made a counterclaim requesting to change the use code for the ’358 patent in reference to Prandin from U-968 to U-546. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:29 am
” Additionally, JMBM earned a National Tier 1 ranking for its Trusts and Estate practice, and numerous Metropolitan Tier 1 rankings across all three of its offices including: Los Angeles: Commercial Litigation, Criminal Defense – White-Collar, Litigation – Trusts & Estates, Tax Law, Trademark Law, Trusts & Estates Law Orange County: Litigation – Patent San Francisco: Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law,… [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
§ 1127 (defining “use in commerce”); see Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
” As for InterMotive’s claim based on “upfitter interface module,” the PTO characterized the term as “(at best) highly descriptive,” but that examiner statement “does not constitute a finding by the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:52 am
Rosetta appealed and applied for a cancellation of Langescheidt’s colour trade mark at the German Trade Mark & Patent Office. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
I, §8, cl. 8, Congress has charged the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) with the task of examining patent applications, 35 U. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:13 am
To determine this, the Federal Patent Court reviewed extensive evidence regarding the public’s perception of the sign as of October 2013. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
City Accommodations Network, Inc. a/k/a U. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:00 pm
Duffy has this post on the Nuijten case being argued to the Federal Circuit today, in which he discusses the Patent and Trademark Office's textualist approach to the interpretation of the Patent Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
Homeland Housewares, LLC (“Homeland”) petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) for an inter partes review of claims 1–16 of U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:51 am
In particular, the USTR pointed to the concerns expressed in the joint policy statement issued by the Department of Justice and the United States Patent and Trademark Office titled “Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary FRAND Commitments” (the “Policy Statement”). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:16 pm
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(Tangible IP) Global IP law: Two recent publications ‘Global Challenge of Intellectual Property Rights’ by R Bird and S C Jain and ‘Global Intellectual Property Law’ by G Dutfield and U Suthersanen (IPKat) Global - Trade Marks / Brands What price brands on the balance sheet? [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:16 am
On inequitable conduct:Clariti argues that the inventor of the ’747 patent, David Chao, and his assignee, co-defendant Contour Optik, Inc., knew of a material reference and intentionally withheld it from the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
Lady Luck Steakhouse & Saloon Inc (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago IP… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
