Search for: "UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY"
Results 301 - 320
of 588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2015, 6:19 am
Among these actions, Section 1502(b) mandated the SEC, in consultation with State, to set forth disclosure and reporting regulations for companies whose products use conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 5:34 am
Way more so than in the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 5:22 am
It is estimated that doctors diagnose over 3,000 cases of mesothelioma each year in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Both the Chinese and Canadian policies are explicitly designed for foreign direct investment by home state companies (whether state-owned enterprises or nationals) – that is, to apply outside rather than inside state borders (the inside/outside problem). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Plaintiffs’ theory of the case was a syllogism: “(i) the Companies represent that the products improve joint health; (ii) scientific evidence will show that glucosamine and chondroitin do not improve joint health more than a placebo would; (iii) therefore, the representations must be false because the products do not and cannot improve joint health. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 5:22 pm
The law is modeled on the United States’ Dodd-Frank Act, under which U.S. companies must inform regulators if they use metals from D.R.C. or neighboring countries. [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The issuer is not required to maintain a secondary market, and, like most structured products, there may be no buyer if the investor needed to liquidate the RCN prior to maturity. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:43 pm
The issuer is not required to maintain a secondary market, and, like most structured products, there may be no buyer if the investor needed to liquidate the RCN prior to maturity. [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:09 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
9 May 2015, 1:10 pm
This is a form of inverse condemnation, for which compensation should be paid by the oil companies and the mineral owners. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:24 am
Beverages Direct sold the product exclusively to retail purchasers located in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:29 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently decided the case of Breton Energy, L.L.C., et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:40 am
” The BLM oversees about 700 million subsurface acres of federal mineral estate and carries out regulatory duties of the Secretary of the Interior for an additional 56 million acres of Indian mineral estate across the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
GRC ended up as a defendant in many asbestos-related suits throughout the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:59 am
Nestlé Waters is the largest distributor of bottled water in the US, with a 31.6% share of all bottled water sales in the United States, almost double that of its closest competitor. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:47 am
More recently, companies have filed free-speech challenges to laws regulating how ordinary products may be marketed or advertised. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
<> Studying the air above oil and gas production areas in the western United States - NOAA and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) researchers and their colleagues are studying what escapes to the air—and how it is transformed in the atmosphere and affects air quality and climate. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 1:04 pm
” Despite the judges’ rulings, a spokesman for Shell, Chevron, and BP, who are all defendants in the lawsuit, maintain that this lawsuit properly belongs in federal court because it involves “important federal issues dealing with navigable waterways and oil, gas and pipeline operations directly affecting mineral production from the Outer Continental Shelf of the United States. [read post]
