Search for: "US v. Powell"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2020, 8:44 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
" These were people used to being lionized, said Frank, and now they were being yelled at. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
Simple arithmetic tells us that the other five justices must be in the majority. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am
“It is discouraging that the Tarrant County District Attorney’s Office continues to pursue new death sentences and set execution dates at a time when many Texas prosecutors have moved away from the use of the death penalty,” said Kristin Houle, executive director of TCADP. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Although neither of President Trump’s appointees joined it, one of them—Justice Neil Gorsuch—wrote the majority opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 5:14 pm
The Supreme Court decided that when a non-violent felon is ordered to stop and submit to police, ignoring that order does not give rise to a reasonable good-faith belief that the use of deadly force is necessary, unless it has been threatened.Justice White was joined by Justices Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, and Stevens.Justice O'Connor wrote the dissent and was joined by Justices Burger and Rehnquist.One local connection -- former UM Law Professor, Steve Winter, argued… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm
Wilkins goes on: In Thompson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
Supreme Court case called Rinaldi v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm
That phrase was also used in Fitzgerald v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Do we say, “Hey, you can’t do as many pushups as the rest of us, so you can’t help us repel the oncoming assault from thousands of enemy soldiers”? [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:36 am
Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964). [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
”)(internetal citation omitted); Powell v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:47 pm
Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:48 pm
Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964). [read post]
12 May 2020, 10:11 am
Washington and Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm
Powell, 392 N.E.2d 598, 599 (I1. [read post]
