Search for: "United Properties and Construction, Inc."
Results 301 - 320
of 1,480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 12:49 pm
IDS Property Cas. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:31 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
See ZTE (SUA), Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
(“Mylan”), Medicines filed suit in the United StatesDistrict Court for the Northern District of Illinois allegingthat Mylan’s ANDA infringed claims 1–3, 7–10, and 17 ofthe ’727 patent, and claims 1–3 and 7–11 of the ’343patent. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
In this case, David Lewis Builders, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:29 pm
Ross Construction Co., 309 U.S. 18, 20-21 (1940). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Pharmatech Solutions, Inc., No. 16-377 Claim Construction: Google, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
An article published in Inc. last fall described five cases that directly affect small businesses and entrepreneurs. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
Disney Enterprises Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Medicines' construction is therefore not permissible. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:05 pm
(Yes, “all”; you only thought your property was private.) [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
Stores, Inc., et al., Appellees, 1976 Ohio App. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:48 am
The Board sustained Chanel, Inc.'s opposition to registration of the mark CHANEL for "real estate development and construction of commercial, residential and hotel property," finding the mark likely to cause dilution-by-blurring of opposer's famous CHANEL mark. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm
On Tuesday, January 26, 2010, the United States Federal District Court for the Middle District of Florida, per Magistrate Pizzo, granted summary judgment against Solomon Technologies, Inc. and in favor of Toyota Motor Corporation relating to claims of infringement relative to U.S. [...]... [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
But again, even the construction of social normative structures occurs in the plural. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:40 pm
In a case of first impression on appeal from the Los Angles County Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal in Areso v.Carmax, Inc. (2nd District, May 20, 2011) held that payment based on the number of units sold was still a commission for purposes of the overtime exemption even if independent of the price of the units. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:22 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 8:06 am
A recent non-construction case, Bar-Harbour Tower Condominium Association, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 8:03 pm
The implied warranty arose between the builder and the ultimate buyer, even in the absence of contractual privity.Lake Buckhorn Property Owners Association, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
