Search for: "United States District Court for the District of Montana" Results 301 - 320 of 731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court: The Constitution’s due process clause provides that a state court has personal jurisdiction over a defendant only when the plaintiff’s claims “arise out of or relate to” the defendant’s activities in the state. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
  The district court then followed Evans and ruled against petitioner. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
Either it's a speech forum, where viewpoint discrimination is banned or it's the state's own speech, and it's an Establishment Clause violation (unless the courts say it's not). [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
Either it's a speech forum, where viewpoint discrimination is banned or it's the state's own speech, and it's an Establishment Clause violation (unless the courts say it's not). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 9:40 am
Southern District of New York, District Court Judge Jed Rakoff, who is known to this blogger for some exceptionally well written sentencing orders, requested that the United States Attorneys Office investigate because according to the transcript, Judge Rakoff said, “it appears not unlikely from the little information available to me that Mr. [read post]
9 May 2013, 4:59 am by Eric Alexander
United States, No. 11-114-BLG-RFC, 2013 U.S. [read post]
The coronavirus has spread to all 50 states, the District of Columbia and multiple territories, with case totals still increasing rapidly in the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:39 am by Anna Christensen
The Court also scheduled for oral argument in due course the first exception to the first interim report of the Special Master in 137-Original, Montana v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:21 pm by msW1Ld
The court rejected “Defendants[’] … concern[] that [it] will be unable to manage state-law claims from twenty-seven state classes” holding “there is no qualitative difference between a federal district court considering class certification of state claims under that state law and a federal court serving as a multi-district litigation forum performing the same task for many federal… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Lower Merion School DistrictDocket: 11-1135Issue(s): (1) Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit improperly overturned the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s factual finding that race was a factor in Lower Merion School District’s (“LMSD”) student redistricting in light of the fact that LMSD did not appeal the District… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:25 am by Audrey Huang
  The United States District Court for the District of Montana struck down the 2009 Rule as violating the ESA because the ESA does not permit partial delisting of a distinct population segment. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:25 am by Miriam Seifter
But the United States and the tribes counter the state each step of the way. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:06 pm by Keith Rizzardi
On September 21, 2009, the Montana District Court issued an order in which plaintiffs prevailed on the first and second counts, while the United States prevailed on the third and fourth counts. [read post]