Search for: "United States v. Coates"
Results 301 - 320
of 436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2007, 3:36 pm
‘271(e)(1) states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products (emphasis added). [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
New Hampshire has the highest level of net outbound smuggling at 52.4 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
" State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
" State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 am
&& 27-35, on file in State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:14 am
The potential violation of Due Process is even more acute when the intimate relationship involves the prosecutor and the presiding judge in the criminal trial. 4 Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
However, the judge did not err in applying Article 7(1)(e); what he had actually done was to state that the policy underlying that article was relevant to the assessment of whether there was a sufficient similarity for the purposes of Article 9(1)(c), both the mark and the sign being shapes. * An assessment of similarity had to be carried out on a global basis by reference to the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign (here the Court cited Case C-252/07 Intel Corp Inc v… [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:26 am
” Kitzes v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
United States, 848 F.2d 362, 364 [2d Cir1988] ). [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932). [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:16 pm
Since the Supreme Court's decision in State Street Bank v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
United States, a case about tribal fishing rights, the judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided court. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant: In the criminal case of United States v. [read post]
